Monthly Archive for August, 2008

6 degrees to the Summer of 2010…

It’s all but a certainty that any deal related to the Cavs, Knicks, or Nets will be tied to “luring Lebron in 2010″.  Well the recent rumors of Zach Randolph being shopped to Memphis for Darko Milicic and Antoine Walker’s bloated expiring deal have done just that.  From Hoopsworld:

This morning’s top NBA story was a trade rumor that the New York Knicks and Memphis Grizzlies could be close to a deal that would send Antoine Walker and Darko Milicic to the Knicks for the often-rumored Zach Randolph. No doubt Knicks fans are scratching their heads . . .and maybe Grizzlies fans, too.

On the Knicks side of the ledger, this would be all about taking $17 million off of their payroll in time for the 2010 NBA free agency period. Milicic’s deal ends that summer and Walker’s contract has a player option that could take him off the books even a year earlier should he choose to exercise it. Ultimately, the move would be made in order to set up a courtship of the Cleveland Cavaliers’ LeBron James.

Wait for 2010… or trade in 2009?

I’m relatively impatient in general. But at least as it relates to the Cavaliers, I think I’ve been the opposite most of my fan life. That would be the obvious statement I suppose. They’ve yet to win an NBA Championship and that is kind of the whole point, but I’m speaking more to the roster moves they make and the time it takes for them to accomplish the goals that mainstream media lay out for Danny Ferry.

I don’t get all that rattled by drawn-out contracts battles, at least not with the role players. I understand that there is no miracle fix for a roster loaded with bloated contracts that can be exercised at any moment. It takes a willing third party team looking to amend mistakes of their own, or time for guaranteed contracts to expire. Fortunately, the NBA will always have the Knicks, and roster mistakes are in no short order.

From 2005 on, it’s been an impossible set of circumstances for the Cavs when faced with how to significantly upgrade the team around Lebron. Sure their have been some player resignings (Drew, LBJ himself, Anderson Varejao, Pavs) and a couple of minimum salary additions (David Wesley, Devin Brown), but by in large, the Cavs made a calculated risk, put a whole lot of money behind that risk, and in the world of guaranteed contracts found themselves stuck.

Danny gets the chance at a redo, at the latest in 2010. Today’s NBA offers two clear paths. Do teams use their expiring deals as tradebait and limit themselves to the malcontents, bad deals, old players, or expiring contract players who are shopped annually (hello Zach Randolph!)? Or, alternatively, do you wait out your own team’s bad deals, let them get off the books, and then attempt to make your additions through the unrestricted free agency market (something that Portland could be attempting to do with Raef LaFrentz’s deal), one which is notorious for driving up salaries and the years needed to get deals done(hello James Posey!)?

That is where the Cavs are at. Many of the trades Ferry has made in the last year have largely been seen as victories. Dealing Larry, acquiring Delonte, bringing in Mo Williams…. all these things seem to have been more positive than negative to the fanbase (albeit Mo is still an unknown, but so little was given up). Given what Ferry has done since 2005 managing to move some of his own worst deals, really makes me want to see what Ferry can do when given his best collection of trading assets to date.  

You never know when a Pau Gasol situation will emerge where a good player whose largely seen as worth his money is traded simply because a team is spending at an unacceptable level for the ownership.  Those are the situations you pray for as fans of opportunistic teams who don’t seem to blink at overpaying (hello Ben Wallace!).

But there’s the other path. The one that could blow up in your face and leave you with nothing, because there is no safety net. The one that asks the fanbase to wait until 2010, and the uncertainty of unrestricted free agency to try to net one of the big dogs (Bosh, Amare, Wade) to play alongside Lebron. Patrick McManamon of the Akron Beacon Journal has already hinted at it publically. It’s something we’ve all thought about privately. But it’s a path so riddled with uncertainty, I can’t help but hesitate to embrace the unknown. McManamon writes:

Everyone has been focusing on the cap space of the New Jersey Nets or the New York Knicks or Athens, Greece, but the Cavs quietly have manipulated themselves to the point that they have more salary-cap room than anyone for that offseason.

The Cavs have almost $30 million in cap space — and that counts James’ salary, which will go away when he opts out of his final year.

As of today the Cavs have four players under contract (sort of) in 2010-11: James for $17 million (though he’s probably going to be a free agent), Maurice Williams for $9.3 million, Daniel Gibson for $4 million and J.J. Hickson on a team option for $1.5 million.

That’s it.

Wally Szczerbiak’s contract expires after this season.

Ben Wallace goes after two seasons.

So does Zydrunas Ilgauskas.

Other players surely will be added to the roster, but the Cavs won’t add anyone who will compromise their ability to bring in talent in 2010.

First let’s get this out of the way.  Patrick’s article does not take into account fully what other teams will be able to do between now and then to free up even more money.  The Cavs will not be alone.  The summer of 2010 has gotten far too much coverage to think that GM’s aren’t scheming league-wide.  That doesn’t make the above scenario impossible.  It just makes it harder to orchestrate.  

Don’t kid yourselves.  That is not an easy scenario to plan for.  Ferry has shown patience and shrewd maneuvering, but there’s a long history of the best laid plans blowing up in team’s faces. This summer the Clippers saw that plan fall apart first hand. Instead of retaining their superstar (Elton Brand) and adding the other big name on the UFA market (Baron), they got Baron Davis and filled the void of the departing Brand with Marcus Camby. Not exactly what they hoped for. That plan required them to let Maggette walk, and to top it off, Kaman didn’t exactly do the PR department any favors with his Benedict Arnolding (that’s not a verb…. but it is now).

As for the Cavs, 2005 saw Michael Redd spurn the Cavs despite what appeared to be the perfect “intangible” mix to counteract the extra year Milwaukee was able to offer him back in 2005. Cleveland was his hometown, he was a star at Ohio State, and he could have played alongside the league’s top talent (although not in 2005) with a skill set that all but guaranteed him as the perfect fit. Instead the Cavs ended up with Larry Hughes. Not Ray Allen. Not Joe Johnson. Larry Hughes. The fanbase is the one who should have tattoed tear drops to their faces. It’s been three straight years of “well it will get better…next time the Cavs can’t possibly do worse”.

So what then do the Cavaliers do to remedy their current roster woes? Two years is an eternity, and while WFNY and Cavalier Attitude have already done a great job of discussing who could be out there in 2010, I think it’s equally relevant to try to take an unbiased look at where the Cavs will be, and how they’ll be portrayed entering what will undoubtedly be the most important summer in team history.

Amar over at Cavalier Attitude had this to say when speaking on the likelihood of the Cavaliers obtaining Amare Stoudemire:

So don’t be surprised if the Suns start falling apart at the seams this season. This is a team that desperately needs to get younger and find more pieces to build around for the future. Just Stoudemire by himself, unlike just James by himself in Cleveland, won’t be enough for the Suns to keep improving down the road with everybody around him retired and no young players around him.

It’s time we as a fan base look in the mirror.  Should the Cavs decide to wait out their bad deals and enter 2010 with a huge pile of money and dreams of Lebron/Bosh or Lebron/Wade or Lebron/Amare, then they will be a shell of a roster.  

To have the full complement of money that they could assemble, it would require allowing Wally, Z, Ben, Anderson, and Sasha all to walk away thus freeing up their money.  

Sure the Suns could be stripped and old by that point, but they’d still likely have Barbosa (our Mo equivalent), Diaw, Robin Lopez (a young big…our JJ equivalent but more in the Varejao mold), and Alando Tucker along with Shaq’s 20 million dollars off the books and Nash’s 14 million.

What I’m saying essentially, is that Amar’s statement above would largely apply to the Cavs as well, since they’d need to rid themselves of nearly all their assets even just to take the chance on luring a guy like Bosh or Stoudamire.  That’s not even considering that it would require “the other superstar” to come to a team that could offer them less money to be the second fiddle to LBJ.  Check out the same statement Amar made, but slightly revisited.  It’s not that far off from the situation the Cavs are faced with:

So don’t be surprised if the Suns Cavs start falling apart at the seams. This is a team that desperately needs to get younger and find more pieces to build around for the future. Just Stoudemire by himself, unlike just James by himself in Cleveland, won’t be enough for the Suns Cavs to keep improving down the road with everybody around him retired and no young players around him.

Olympic summers like this one foster hope, because superstars played as a team, and things like patriotism and love of the game are the story lines for what drive guys, but that doesn’t apply in today’s NBA.  Marion couldn’t coexist as part of team.  He wanted his.  Redd had the chance to join a better team, but stayed as the big fish in the small Milwaukee pond.  It’s foolish to think things will be as easy as simply waiting out a couple more moderately successful years with this current Cavs incarnation and then turning the roster spots of Wally, Ben, Z, Snow, and Sasha into a perennial All-Star.  

It would require sacrifice from another team’s superstar both monetarily and on the court.  It would require patience from Lebron and the type of commitment to the Cavs that no one truly knows if he would make before seeing who Ferry could lure.  And it requires Ferry to pass on the opportunity to turn limited overpaid players, into more talented players because of their attractive contract status… one that can’t be used if their deals are allowed to expire.  That’s a lot of faith to place in a “best case scenario” when “well we’ve got Lebron, that’s the difference” has yet to produce any beneficial second banana results.

I think it’s pretty obvious what way I feel.  I would love the idea of Chris Bosh alongside Lebron James.  But call me the pessimist.  I think the trade market has proven far easier to navigate for Ferry than the free agency market, and until I see something to indicate that big money deals like Greece aren’t truly what drives most players, then I’m not buying into the “well he’ll come to Cleveland for less money to play with Lebron as second fiddle” dreams.

Yep….obligatory poll time…..

What do the Cavs do with their expirings?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

 

Lebron overjoyed…. Boozer an emotionless robot

The best part of this video to me is not Lebron singing the star-spangled banner…..

It’s definitely how excited everyone is in stark contrast to Carlos Boozer.  

Obviously sitting on the bench pretty much all game every game gave him a lot of time to soak in the magnitude of what it would mean to win Olympic gold.  By the time this post-game locker room video was taken, he was to the point of been there, done that.

 

This Lebron/Kidd thing has gotten ridiculous

So it’s no secret Lebron James loves Jason Kidd.  Last year, James lobbied for him to be traded to the Cavs, and considering the ridiculous size of Kidd’s contract, you’d have to have a healthy appreciation for his abilities in order to advocate handcuffing a team’s payroll with an aging point guard making in excess of 20 million dollars.  Well the Olympics brought a whole new level of man love as Lebron and Kidd played their ways to a gold medal performance for Team USA.  After the Olympics, Kidd had the following to say:

“I’m undefeated,” Kidd, 35, said. “I told them I can retire now from international ball, but LeBron [James] threw out something I didn’t like. He said he won’t play in 2012 unless I’m there.”

I could pretend I’m writing this because I’m interested in talking about Kidd and Lebron playing together someday, or how ridiculous it is that Jason Kidd is giving his gold medal to the wife of Las Vegas Casino owner Steve Wynn, or even Lebron’s claims of not playing in 2012 without Kidd, but I’ll leave that to others who do it better (Waiting for Next Year spoke on this subject earlier today even).  I really just wanted to throw my hat in the photoshop arena and combine a few of the creepier images that have emerged since the Olympics concluded.  

First there was this image of Jason Kidd taken after Team USA won gold.

He looks like a pedophile.  There’s a part of me that believes that he’s giving the medal away as a way to rid himself of any incriminating evidence (”the man with the giant gold medal and huge head touched me!”). But then while reading Ball Don’t Lie, I came upon this image of Lebron James at Morton’s upon returning to Cleveland.  

And now….. I give you the uncanny similarity.

I’ve available for freelance work.  I know my photoshop skills are tremendous.

 

 

Zydrunas Ilgauskas: Headed for the rafters?

Prepare to be ballwashed Mr. Ilgauskas.  There couldn’t be less news going on if we lived in China so I’ve decided that you’ve earned a look back at your achievements in the NBA, and a look towards your post-career legacy.

Certain statistics get brought up all the time during FSN Ohio Cavalier broadcasts.  Things like Lebron James’s 4th quarter scoring average, the NBA’s “youngest to” stats, or where James’s season statistics rank against the greats like Magic, Oscar Robertson, and Larry Bird are plastered all over Cavs telecasts.  The graphics are ready to go and are used as frequently as the dump button for microphones within 20 feet of Kevin Garnett during an NBA game.

But last year, during one of the Cavaliers regular season match-ups with the Celtics, FSN pulled out a new statistic that I had to let sink in.  

At that time, Zydrunas Ilgauskas trailed only Paul Pierce as the NBA player with the longest tenure on one team yet to win a championship (642 games for Zydrunas Ilgauskas to Pierce’s 732).  He now sits atop that statistic, for better or worse, as the one stable component to Cavaliers’ basketball for the last decade.  

He has played in 642 games for the Cavaliers during his 11 year career, and the his most celebrated moment was quite possibly when he was the recipient of a hug from Lebron James after winning the 2007 Eastern Conference Finals.  

Look at the photo.  His face is shielded from view, and when time passes and future generations unfamiliar with his game reflect upon Z’s contributions, that photo gives the impression that he was riding the pine (thanks to the warmups).  Z has had plenty of on-court triumphs, but none on the NBA’s biggest stage, and it’d be a shame if the most viewed video of Big Z on YouTube turns out to be this one:

 

Don’t worry.  There’s competition (such as directly below), but generally speaking, if you’re YouTube highlight video contains footage of making regular season free throws and starts with you missing your first attempt, you’re game wasn’t one that translates well to the YouTube generation.

 

But as much as I kid about his awkward motion on the court, or his less than exciting midrange and free throw proficiency, Z is taken for granted by too many.

For the better part of 10 years, Cavs fans have had an upper echelon center when the rest of the team has been in constant flux. While he’s only made two All-Star appearances (2003 and 2005), a look at his numbers shows a tremendous level of consistency. While other centers have fallen off considerably after the age of 30, Z is still going strong and has developed the strengths in his game that will remain in tact irrespective of age (i.e. his shooting touch, his ability to hit free throws).

His 2007-2008 season brought his best year for rebounding (9.3 per game), his 4th most productive scoring year (at 14.1 points per game), and a third consecutive season of shooting north of 80% on his free throw attempts.  He also logged more than 70 games for the 6th straight season.

Six names grace the retired numbers list of the Cleveland Cavaliers. They are as follows:

7 - Bingo Smith, F, 1970-79 (12.6 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 720 games as a Cavalier)
22 - Larry Nance, F, 1988-94 (16.8 ppg, 8.22 rpg, 2.5 bpg, 433 games as a Cavalier)
25 - Mark Price, G, 1986-95 (16.4 ppg, 7.2 apg, 90.4 FT%, 582 games as a Cavalier)
34 - Austin Carr, G, 1971-80 (16.1 ppg, 81 FT%, 635 games as a Cavalier)
42 - Nate Thurmond, C, 1975-77 (5.0 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 114 games as a Cavalier)
43 - Brad Daugherty, C, 1986-94 (19.0 ppg, 9.5 rpg, 548 games as a Cavalier)

Add Zydrunas to the mix and you wouldn’t raise many eyebrows from a numbers standpoint.  Sure he presided over some of the Cavaliers worst teams following the departure of Mark Price, but one man does not make a team.  Three of the Cavaliers greats (Price, Nance, and Daugherty) won so much because they happened to be on the team simultaneously, and one of the remaining three (Nate Thurmond) barely played with the Cavs.  Z’s numbers nestle in there seamlessly:

11 - Zydrunas Ilgauskas, C, 1997-? (14.5 ppg, 7.9 rpg, 642 games as a Cavalier)

Now we’ll likely see those career numbers dip, but if Ilgauskas logs just 79 more games over the remainder of the two years left on his contract, he’ll be atop the list amongst Cavalier greats for the longest time wearing the Wine & Gold (or putrid lightning bolt accented white, black, and light blue…those uniforms never happened).

Every Cavs fan knows about Z’s character.  They know about his resiliency, bouncing back from devastating early career foot injuries to become one of the Cavs lynchpins.  They know about his personal hardships, having to suffer through some tragic events during what was the Cavaliers best season in team history.  They know about how professionally he’s handled the Cavs decision not to allow him to compete in the Olympics due to injury concerns (a decision that despite my love for the Cavs I wish they would have reconsidered).  

And hopefully, when Z walks away, future generations will know him as the last player in Cavalier history to wear #11 and the second to hoist a championship trophy (right after Lebron gets to touch it).

Will Big Z have his number retired?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...